http://b2evolution.net/news/?disp=comments en-EU http://backend.userland.com/rss 60 Tue, 07 Nov 2006 10:21:32 +0000 maivanduc [Visitor] c16963@http://b2evolution.net/ Thank tou ! http://b2evolution.net/news/2006/09/20/b2evolution_1_8_2_stable_serenity_releas#c16963 Fri, 03 Nov 2006 11:55:34 +0000 Daygeee [Visitor] c16959@http://b2evolution.net/ Well just seeing this for the first time. I think I'll give it a try. http://b2evolution.net/news/2006/09/20/b2evolution_1_8_2_stable_serenity_releas#c16959 Thu, 05 Oct 2006 19:47:25 +0000 Keith [Visitor] c16943@http://b2evolution.net/ Sound like it is worth upgrading. I will give it a try over this weekend, as well. My current version is at 0.9.1, so I think it needs a new look here: http://keith.hostmatrix.org/tjc http://b2evolution.net/news/2006/09/20/b2evolution_1_8_2_stable_serenity_releas#c16943 Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:51:44 +0000 Francois Planque [Member] c16938@http://b2evolution.net/ I don't think it's slower than before, but I guess it depends on exactly what version you compare it to... http://b2evolution.net/news/2006/09/20/b2evolution_1_8_2_stable_serenity_releas#c16938 Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:28:32 +0000 Helgefar [Visitor] c16937@http://b2evolution.net/ Is it just me, or is the backoffice working slower than before? Thanks for a nice update<img src="http://b2evolution.net/rsc/smilies/icon_wink.gif" title=";)" alt=";)" class="middle" width="15" height="15" /> ]]> http://b2evolution.net/news/2006/09/20/b2evolution_1_8_2_stable_serenity_releas#c16937 Sat, 23 Sep 2006 05:56:14 +0000 guido waldenmeier [Visitor] c16933@http://b2evolution.net/ will test it this weekend<br /> i think it rocks<br /> greetings to @ll take care i think it rocks
greetings to @ll take care]]> http://b2evolution.net/news/2006/09/20/b2evolution_1_8_2_stable_serenity_releas#c16933