b2evolution News Blog - Latest Comments on W3C uses b2evolution :) https://b2evolution.net/news/?disp=comments en-US http://backend.userland.com/rss 60 edbennett in response to: W3C uses b2evolution :) Sat, 27 May 2006 01:29:44 +0000 c14301@https://b2evolution.net/ <p>They most certainly DO linkback! Just look at the page and see the bottom of the sidebar for the b2evolution image linked to b2evolution.</p> They most certainly DO linkback! Just look at the page and see the bottom of the sidebar for the b2evolution image linked to b2evolution.

]]> https://b2evolution.net/news/2006/03/27/w3c_uses_b2evolution#c14301 FormerUser in response to: W3C uses b2evolution :) Tue, 09 May 2006 18:31:41 +0000 FormerUser c13071@https://b2evolution.net/ <p>Why the excitement? Unless you look at the source you&#8217;d never know - it&#8217;s not like they link back or anything.</p> Why the excitement? Unless you look at the source you’d never know - it’s not like they link back or anything.

]]> https://b2evolution.net/news/2006/03/27/w3c_uses_b2evolution#c13071 Jeff Preston in response to: W3C uses b2evolution :) Mon, 01 May 2006 08:12:51 +0000 Jeff Preston c12568@https://b2evolution.net/ <p>That is great news. When will 1.6 be a &#8220;stable&#8221; release? I am looking forward to working with it.</p> That is great news. When will 1.6 be a “stable” release? I am looking forward to working with it.

]]> https://b2evolution.net/news/2006/03/27/w3c_uses_b2evolution#c12568 Cbrabham in response to: W3C uses b2evolution :) Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:15:28 +0000 Cbrabham c12560@https://b2evolution.net/ <p>I used to use b2evo but comment SPAM eventually caused by web-host to insist that I try other software.</p> <p>This is a shame, as I liked b2evo much better than any of the alternatives. </p> <p>I agree with the earlier post that suggests getting more serious about security issues. If that had been done six months back, I would still be using b2evo today.</p> <p>Charles</p> I used to use b2evo but comment SPAM eventually caused by web-host to insist that I try other software.

This is a shame, as I liked b2evo much better than any of the alternatives.

I agree with the earlier post that suggests getting more serious about security issues. If that had been done six months back, I would still be using b2evo today.

Charles

]]> https://b2evolution.net/news/2006/03/27/w3c_uses_b2evolution#c12560 JC John SESE Cuneta in response to: W3C uses b2evolution :) Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:58:23 +0000 JC John SESE Cuneta c11373@https://b2evolution.net/ <p>nice! let&#8217;s help spread b2e to more orgs ^_^</p> nice! let’s help spread b2e to more orgs ^_^

]]> https://b2evolution.net/news/2006/03/27/w3c_uses_b2evolution#c11373 Elpie in response to: W3C uses b2evolution :) Tue, 04 Apr 2006 02:57:53 +0000 Elpie c10788@https://b2evolution.net/ <p>Response to Carl - There are many methods for keeping spam off b2evo, its just a matter of checking the forums. I have been using b2evo for some time now and am very happy with the stability, security, and spam fighting tips provided in the forums that have kept referrer and comment spam much lower than the spam in my email inbox.<br /> Speed of development of new releases is no way to judge an open source project. Development is always continuing, but heck - if it aint broke, why fix it? There are thousands of satisfied b2evo users if the number of installs is any indication. The fact that W3C is using it says a lot!</p> <p>The one thing you said Carl, that I do agree with, is that Wordpress gets a lot more notice. The b2evolution team are too busy coding to sing their own praises but there should be more promotion. The fact that W3C uses it would mean a lot to a whole heap of potential users. Wordpress gets a lot of promotion, but that does not mean its the best blog. Unless b2 users get into spreading the word, b2evolution will be the best kept secret around. </p> Response to Carl - There are many methods for keeping spam off b2evo, its just a matter of checking the forums. I have been using b2evo for some time now and am very happy with the stability, security, and spam fighting tips provided in the forums that have kept referrer and comment spam much lower than the spam in my email inbox.
Speed of development of new releases is no way to judge an open source project. Development is always continuing, but heck - if it aint broke, why fix it? There are thousands of satisfied b2evo users if the number of installs is any indication. The fact that W3C is using it says a lot!

The one thing you said Carl, that I do agree with, is that Wordpress gets a lot more notice. The b2evolution team are too busy coding to sing their own praises but there should be more promotion. The fact that W3C uses it would mean a lot to a whole heap of potential users. Wordpress gets a lot of promotion, but that does not mean its the best blog. Unless b2 users get into spreading the word, b2evolution will be the best kept secret around.

]]> https://b2evolution.net/news/2006/03/27/w3c_uses_b2evolution#c10788 laygnuk in response to: W3C uses b2evolution :) Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:05:55 +0000 c10686@https://b2evolution.net/ <p>Whhhooo :) Good luck for the next stable release!</p> Whhhooo :) Good luck for the next stable release!

]]> https://b2evolution.net/news/2006/03/27/w3c_uses_b2evolution#c10686 Bill in response to: W3C uses b2evolution :) Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:39:00 +0000 Bill c10624@https://b2evolution.net/ <p>Cool.</p> <p>The next step is: Microsoft!</p> Cool.

The next step is: Microsoft!

]]> https://b2evolution.net/news/2006/03/27/w3c_uses_b2evolution#c10624